I've only had one auto Cougar and thought it really suited the car and wasn't much slower than the manual, good to see your getting it the way you want it Andy but you will still get asked what it is 

The 1989 (to 1997) Thunderbird, 140bhp 3.8 V6 and presumably the 200bhp+ 5.0 V8, 4.6 V8 and 210bhp/230bhp 3.8 V6 supercharged, all 1000rpm per 36mph, 2000rpm @ 72mph (auto overdrive). Much lower than any other car I've driven including the Cougar.the rpm when cruising at speed is a lot lower than suzi at say 70mph.. i dont know the ratio's but defo lower at the top speeds.
Maybe if there was a meet near Northampton I could do people's on the day if they have a spare set.Nice job, shame you don’t live closer.
You could do mine too !
Went from this:
View attachment 23658
to this:
View attachment 23659
And now no-one should be in any doubt as to what it is………..
View attachment 23660
![]()
Find an Auto much nicer to drive on today's roads and mine seems to love hillstbh tilly the auto in s mode and if u kick her down is just as fast imo.. but slower on launch.
the auto seems to have more torque too ive noticed....probably due to the torque doubler in the converter.
one other thing, the rpm when cruising at speed is a lot lower than suzi at say 70mph.. i dont know the ratio's but defo lower at the top speeds.
in my opinion the auto is better for long journeys and is my car of choice for my yearly stay at senna, cornwall.
much easier to drive and much more hassle free.. especially in traffic.
i love the auto and certainly wouldn't be put off buying one
but then tilly has had some massive improvements done on the whole engine intake etc so she is a different beastie...
looking forward to seeing yours Andy as never seen a red one in the flesh![]()
and who dares to say us car folk don't recycle ehWill be dropping kane off later lol